Module 2: Livelihood approaches in a nutshell
2.4: The frameworks of DFID and RLS compared
| DFID Approach | Issues | RLS Approach |
|---|---|---|
Predominantly deductive reasoning Systemic and dynamic linkages in time and space, inspired by New Institutional Economics |
Conceptual approach |
Predominantly inductive reasoning based on practical experience. Applying metaphoric and symbolic representation of livelihood |
Proposing explicit linkages between micro and macro contexts of livelihood, both in the field of Policy, Institutions and Processes and the Vulnerability Context |
Linking micro and macro perspectives |
Addressing micro-macro linkages only implicitly through the square called "Socio-Economic Space" in the RLS Mandala |
Addressing poverty explicitly with the reference to vulnerability and its linkages to assets for coping |
Poverty orientation |
No explicit conceptual orientation towards poverty |
Focusing on the constellation of assets of livelihood systems, with an economic bias |
Addressing psychological aspects of livelihood |
Acknowledging inner and outer realities of livelihood, including emotional dimensions |
Focusing on changing asset portfolios of livelihood systems and interaction with institutions (value system) and policy context. |
Decision-making at household level |
Embedding decision-making into inner and outer realities of livelihood and it gender-related dimensions |
Strategies explicitly addressed as a systemic loop, inviting exploration of livelihood activities and outcomes |
Role of livelihood strategies |
Strategies implicitly addressed, heuristic approach, stressing forces and factors relevant for strategy |
Applicable for rural and urban livelihoods Not bound to project-based development efforts Can be integrated into PCM (Project Cycle Management) |
Scope for application |
Originally conceived for a rural context but adaptable to urban livelihood as well Not bound to project-based development efforts Can be integrated into PCM (Project Cycle Management) |
Conclusion: A blending of elements of both frameworks generates value added.
See Doc 2.5. on the application of livelihood frameworks for analysing the context (Doc 3.2) and identifying entry points for interventions (Doc 3.4).
