Module 2: Livelihood approaches in a nutshell

2.3: Common features of the livelihood approaches of DFID and RLS

• Both the DFID SL approach and the RLS approach offer a "heuristic" tool in form of a framework for exploring and analysing livelihood. They propose neither "models" nor "theories" of livelihood. Compare Doc 1.4.
• Both approaches to livelihood can only produce sensible results, if the application of the frameworks (here DFID SL framework and or the RLS Mandala) respects a set of guiding principles.
• Both approaches advocate a clear distinction between the application of a holistic perception for analysis and better understanding poverty on the one hand, and the need to adopt a focused approach for the design and implementation of development support for poverty reduction, on the other.
• Both approaches provide orientation for a livelihood-focused application of methods and tools, as they are made available by social and technical science, including the development of specific instruments like Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA).
• Both approaches are a work in progress and not finalised products. They are not conceived as recipes but instead offer conceptual inspiration for development efforts aiming at more sustainable livelihoods. They are complementary to other development approaches in use.